Black-box complexities of combinatorial problems

22Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Black-box complexity, counting the number of queries needed to find the optimum of a problem without having access to an explicit problem description, was introduced by Droste, Jansen, and Wegener [S. Droste, T. Jansen, I. Wegener, Upper and lower bounds for randomized search heuristics in black-box optimization, Theory of Computing Systems 39 (2006) 525-544] to measure the difficulty of solving an optimization problem via generic search heuristics such as evolutionary algorithms, simulated annealing or ant colony optimization. Since then, a number of similar complexity notions were introduced. However, so far these new notions were only analyzed for artificial test problems. In this paper, we move a step forward and analyze the different black-box complexity notions for two classic combinatorial problems, namely the minimum spanning tree and the single-source shortest path problem. Besides proving bounds for their black-box complexities, our work reveals that the choice of how to model the optimization problem has a significant influence on its black-box complexity. In addition, when regarding the unbiased (symmetry-invariant) black-box complexity of combinatorial problems, it is important to choose a meaningful definition of unbiasedness.© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doerr, B., Kötzing, T., Lengler, J., & Winzen, C. (2013). Black-box complexities of combinatorial problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 471, 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2012.10.039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free