Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude and setting

32Citations
Citations of this article
164Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, we review the debriefing literature and point to the dilemma that although debriefings especially intend to enhance team (rather than individual) learning, it is particularly this team setting that poses risks for debriefing effectiveness (e.g., preference-consistent information sharing, lack of psychological safety inhibiting structured information sharing, ineffective debriefing models). These risks can be managed with a mindful approach with respect to content (e.g., specific learning objectives), structure (e.g., reactions phase, analysis phase, summary phase), attitude (e.g., honesty, curiosity, holding the trainee in positive regard) and setting (e.g., briefings to provide orientation and establish psychological safety). We point to the potential of integrating systemic methods such as circular questions into debriefings, discuss the empirical evidence for debriefing effectiveness and highlight the importance of faculty development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kolbe, M., Grande, B., & Spahn, D. R. (2015, March 1). Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude and setting. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology. Bailliere Tindall Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free