High temporal resolution MRI quantification of global cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption in response to apneic challenge

53Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present a technique for quantifying global cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO 2) in absolute physiologic units at 3-second temporal resolution and apply the technique to quantify the dynamic CMRO 2 response to volitional apnea. Temporal resolution of 3 seconds was achieved via a combination of view sharing and superior sagittal sinus-based estimation of total cerebral blood flow (tCBF) rather than tCBF measurement in the neck arteries. These modifications were first validated in three healthy adults and demonstrated to produce minimal errors in image-derived blood flow and venous oxygen saturation (S v O 2) values. The technique was then applied in 10 healthy adults during an apnea paradigm of three repeated 30-second breath-holds. Subject-averaged baseline tCBF, arteriovenous oxygen difference (AVO 2 D), and CMRO 2 were 48.6±7.0 mL/100 g per minute, 29.4±3.4 %HbO 2, and 125.1±11.4 μmol/100 g per minute, respectively. Subject-averaged maximum changes in tCBF and AVO 2 D were 43.5±9.4% and-32.1±5.7%, respectively, resulting in a small (6.0±3.5%) but statistically significant (P=0.00044, two-tailed t-test) increase in average end-apneic CMRO 2. This method could be used to investigate neurometabolic-hemodynamic relationships in normal physiology, to better define the biophysical origins of the BOLD signal, and to quantify neurometabolic responsiveness in diseases of altered neurovascular reactivity. © 2013 ISCBFM All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodgers, Z. B., Jain, V., Englund, E. K., Langham, M. C., & Wehrli, F. W. (2013). High temporal resolution MRI quantification of global cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption in response to apneic challenge. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 33(10), 1514–1522. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2013.110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free