Neostigmine-induced reversal of vecuronium in normal weight, overweight and obese female patients

43Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. The purpose of this study was to compare neostigmine-induced reversal of vecuronium in normal weight, overweight and obese female patients. Methods. In total, 15 each of normal weight (18.5≤BMI<25), overweight (25≤BMI<30) and obese (BMI≥30) patients were enrolled. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with fentanyl, propofol and nitrous oxide. Neuromuscular block was induced with vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 on the basis of the patient's real body weight (RBW) and was monitored using acceleromyographic train-of-four (TOF) of the adductor pollicis. All patients received neostigmine 0.04 mg kg-1 combined with atropine 0.02 mg kg-1 at 25% recovery of the first twitch (T1) of TOF and were allowed to recover to a TOF ratio of 0.9. Results. The time from administration of vecuronium to spontaneous recovery of T1 to 25% of control was significantly longer in the obese [mean (sd, range); 68.4 (16.3, 39.8-110.8) min] and the overweight groups [49.3 (6.2, 39.8-60.8) min] as compared with the normal weight group [41.0 (9.0, 27.5-59.5) min]. The times for facilitated recovery with neostigmine to a TOF ratio of 0.7 did not differ among groups. However, the recovery to a TOF ratio of 0.9 in the obese [25.9 (6.7, 13.5-41.0) min] and the overweight groups [14.6 (7.7, 3.3-28.5) min] were significantly longer than that in the normal weight group [6.9 (2.0, 3.0-10.7) min]. Conclusions. Early reversal after neostigmine is prompt; however, recovery to a TOF ratio of 0.9 is slow in overweight and obese patients when vecuronium is dosed on the basis of the patient's RBW. © 2006 Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suzuki, T., Masaki, G., & Ogawa, S. (2006). Neostigmine-induced reversal of vecuronium in normal weight, overweight and obese female patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 97(2), 160–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free