This paper considers alternative styles of philosophy, based on art or science, through an investigation of Rudolf Carnap and Martin Heidegger. Carnap’s criticism of Heidegger’s account of das Nichts is analysed in relation to Immanuel Kant’s theory of the imagination. Heidegger’s account of the work of art demonstrates philosophies that take science as their model, over-emphasize cognition, and do not adequately consider the importance of apprehension.
CITATION STYLE
Taylor, M. (2016). The aesthetic turn. Approaching Religion, 6(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.30664/ar.67586
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.