An empirical study of goto in C code from github repositories

31Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is nearly 50 years since Dijkstra argued that goto obscures the ow of control in program execution and urged programmers to abandon the goto statement. While past research has shown that goto is still in use, little is known about whether goto is used in the unrestricted manner that Dijkstra feared, and if it is harmful' enough to be a part of a post-release bug. We, therefore, conduct a two part empirical study - (1) qualitatively analyze a statistically representative sample of 384 files from a population of almost 250K C programming language files collected from over 11K GitHub repositories and find that developers use goto in C files for error handling (80:21 ± 5%) and cleaning up resources at the end of a procedure (40:36 ± 5%); and (2) quantitatively analyze the commit history from the release branches of six OSS projects and find that no goto statement was re- moved/modified in the post-release phase of four of the six projects. We conclude that developers limit themselves to using goto appropriately in most cases, and not in an un- restricted manner like Dijkstra feared, thus suggesting that goto does not appear to be harmful in practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagappan, M., Robbes, R., Kamei, Y., Tanter, É., Mcintosh, S., Mockus, A., & Hassan, A. E. (2015). An empirical study of goto in C code from github repositories. In 2015 10th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2015 - Proceedings (pp. 404–414). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786805.2786834

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free