Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A widely accepted belief across a range of subfields in psychology is that print activates semantics “automatically” in some sense. One such sense is that activating semantics does not require capacity. This view is assessed here in the context of the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) paradigm because it provides a way of determining whether semantic activation requires a form of capacity. Task 1 was tone classification. Task 2 was Stroop color naming. The distractors consisted of color words on some trials (e.g., BLUE), and semantic associates on others (e.g., TOMATO). Both types of distractors yielded a pattern of data inconsistent with the widespread view that semantic activation is capacity free.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Besner, D., & Reynolds, M. (2017). Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(3), 907–913. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1178-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free