Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Skeletal sample selection for evolutionary palaeoproteomic studies is currently based on the availability of material, without taking into account the influence of bone biology on the proteome composition of living bone. A prime example concerns the cortical and trabecular bone that is present simultaneously in many skeletal elements, including those recovered from archaeological sites. These two bone components are formed and maintained in different manners and at different rates. In palaeoproteomics there is currently no empirical data demonstrating differences in composition and/or preservation of cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. Here we analyse pairs of cortical and trabecular bone from six Early Holocene ungulate rib specimens from the site of La Draga, Spain, using shotgun proteomics. We observe generally larger proteomes, a larger number of peptides, and lower rates of degradation, for the cortical bone samples compared to the trabecular bone samples. These results suggest that in degraded proteomic contexts, preference should be given to the sampling of cortical bone in order to maximise the retrieval of larger and better-preserved bone proteomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ásmundsdóttir, R. D., Hansen, J., Fagernäs, Z., Troché, G., Olsen, J. V., Saña Seguí, M., & Welker, F. (2024). Early Holocene preservation differences between cortical and trabecular bone proteomes. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104643

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free