Current understanding of the relationship between cervical manipulation and stroke: What does it mean for the chiropractic profession?

26Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The understanding of the relationship between cervical manipulative therapy (CMT) and vertebral artery dissection and stroke (VADS) has evolved considerably over the years. In the beginning the relationship was seen as simple cause-effect, in which CMT was seen to cause VADS in certain susceptible individuals. This was perceived as extremely rare by chiropractic physicians, but as far more common by neurologists and others. Recent evidence has clarified the relationship considerably, and suggests that the relationship is not causal, but that patients with VADS often have initial symptoms which cause them to seek care from a chiropractic physician and have a stroke some time after, independent of the chiropractic visit. This new understanding has shifted the focus for the chiropractic physician from one of attempting to "screen" for "risk of complication to manipulation" to one of recognizing the patient who may be having VADS so that early diagnosis and intervention can be pursued. In addition, this new understanding presents the chiropractic profession with an opportunity to change the conversation about CMT and VADS by taking a proactive, public health approach to this uncommon but potentially devastating disorder. © 2010 Murphy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, D. R. (2010, August 3). Current understanding of the relationship between cervical manipulation and stroke: What does it mean for the chiropractic profession? Chiropractic and Osteopathy. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-18-22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free