Fast-track rehabilitation VS conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: A meta-analysis

28Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the fast-track rehabilitation protocol and laparoscopic surgery (LFT) vs conventional care strategies and laparoscopic surgery (LCC). METHODS: Studies and relevant literature comparing the effects of LFT and LCC for colorectal malignancy were identified in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and EMBASE. The complications and re-admission after approximately 1 mo were RESULTS: Six recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis, which related to 655 enrolled patients. These studies demonstrated that compared with LCC, LFT has fewer complications and a similar incidence of re-admission after approximately 1 mo. LFT had a pooled RR of 0.60 (95%CI: 0.46-0.79, P < 0.001) compared with a pooled RR of 0.69 (95%CI: 0.34-1.40, P > 0.5) for LCC. CONCLUSION: LFT for colorectal malignancy is safe and efficacious. Larger prospective RCTs should be conducted to further compare the efficacy and safety of this approach. © 2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, P., Fang, F., Cai, J. X., Tang, D., Li, Q. G., & Wang, D. R. (2013). Fast-track rehabilitation VS conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: A meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 19(47), 9119–9126. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free