“At Risk” Adolescent Boys’ Engagement With an Employability Intervention: A Qualitative Exploration

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The individualization of Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET) status has contributed to a culture of blame that frames adolescent boys’ transition into employment and economic independence. Drawing on Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory, we explored how adolescent boys categorized as “at risk” of becoming NEET engage with a school-based work-readiness intervention. We interviewed five adolescent boys aged 13–14 years about their experiences of the intervention. Using reflexive thematic analysis, three main themes were constructed: (1) challenge mediated by choice; (2) access to supportive relationships; and (3) recognizing personal development. The findings illustrate the interrelatedness of adolescent boys’ engagement with, and within, their environment; findings support a push to consider engagement as an ecological concept. We end with considerations for more ecologically sensitive approaches to work-related intervention and the assessment of adolescent boys’ “at risk” status.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carmichael-Murphy, P., Demkowicz, O., & Humphrey, N. (2022). “At Risk” Adolescent Boys’ Engagement With an Employability Intervention: A Qualitative Exploration. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.924456

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free