Job Characteristics, Affective Commitment, and Turnover Intentions: A Dual-Theory Examination of Generation Z

0Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigates the extent to which core job characteristics—autonomy, task identity, task significance, and skill variety—influence affective commitment and turnover intentions among Generation Z employees in Vietnam. Based on the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) and Conservation of Resources (COR) theoretical frameworks, the study seeks to elucidate how early-career employees interpret job resources within a collectivist, hierarchical, and resource-constrained environment. A structured quantitative design was employed, drawing on survey data from 312 Gen Z respondents across diverse organizational settings. Measurement validity and reliability were established via Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Cronbach’s Alpha, while hypotheses were tested using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Empirical findings reveal that task identity exerts a negative influence on affective commitment, whereas autonomy, task identity, and skill variety are positively associated with turnover intentions. Task significance demonstrates no significant effect on either outcome. Conversely, affective commitment emerges as a strong inverse predictor of turnover intentions, underscoring its role as a stabilizing psychological resource. This research contributes to the existing literature by integrating JD-R and COR theories to challenge the presumed universality of job resource effects. It underscores the contextual sensitivity of job design, particularly for younger cohorts in emerging markets. The findings offer practical implications for designing culturally and generationally responsive retention strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mac, Y. T. H., & Tran, C. T. (2026). Job Characteristics, Affective Commitment, and Turnover Intentions: A Dual-Theory Examination of Generation Z. Emerging Science Journal, 10(1), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2026-010-01-016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free