Testing for causality and prognosis: Etiological and prognostic models

47Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Etiological research aims to investigate the causal relationship between putative risk factors (or determinants) and a given disease or other outcome. In contrast, prognostic research aims to predict the probability of a given clinical outcome and in this perspective the pathophysiology of the disease is not an issue. Multivariate modeling is a fundamental tool both to infer causality and to investigate prognostic factors in epidemiological research. The analytical approaches to etiological and prognostic studies are strictly dependent on the research question and imply knowledge of the main statistical procedures for model building and data interpretation. In this paper we describe the application of multivariate statistical modeling in etiological and prognostic research. We will mainly focus on the differences in model building and data interpretation between these two areas of epidemiologic research. © 2008 International Society of Nephrology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tripepi, G., Jager, K. J., Dekker, F. W., & Zoccali, C. (2008). Testing for causality and prognosis: Etiological and prognostic models. Kidney International, 74(12), 1512–1515. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2008.416

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free