Empirical examination of the Black–Scholes model: evidence from the United States stock market

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Option pricing is crucial in enabling investors to hedge against risks. The Black–Scholes option pricing model is widely used for this purpose. This paper investigates whether the Black–Scholes model is a good indicator of option pricing in the United States stock market. We examine the relevance of the Black–Scholes model to certain stocks using paired sample t-test and Corrado and Miller’s approximation for the implied volatility. Empirical tests are applied to determine the significance of the relationship between the actual market values and the Black–Scholes model values. Paired sample t-tests are applied to 582 call options and 579 put options. The empirical test results show that there is no significant difference between the actual market premium value and the Black–Scholes model premium value for seven out of nine stocks considered for call options, and four out of nine stocks considered for put options. Thus, we conclude that the Black–Scholes option pricing model can be used to price call options but is not suitable for pricing put options in the United States stock market.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salami, M. F. (2024). Empirical examination of the Black–Scholes model: evidence from the United States stock market. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2024.1216386

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free