Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: A prospective comparison

54Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose:To compare the visual outcomes and optical quality of 2 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) with those of a monofocal IOL.Settings:Eye Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.Design:Prospective cohort study.Methods:The study included patients who had cataract surgery and were implanted with a Tecnis Symfony Extended Range of Vision (EROV) IOL (ZXR00), a zonal refractive multifocal IOL (Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15), or a monofocal IOL (Lentis L-313). Postoperative examinations took place at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months and included visual acuity at far, intermediate, and near distances, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberrations, and modulation transfer function (MTF). Patients completed the Visual Function Index questionnaire (VF-14), the Quality of Vision questionnaire (QoV), and a visual quality self-evaluation.Results:One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled. The EROV and multifocal IOLs achieved a significantly better range of intermediate vergences (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Song, X., Liu, X., Wang, W., Zhu, Y., Qin, Z., Lyu, D., … Ke, Y. (2020). Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: A prospective comparison. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 46(4), 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free