Divergent populations of HIV-infected naive and memory CD4+ T cell clones in children on antiretroviral therapy

9Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Naive cells comprise 90% of the CD4+ T cell population in neonates and exhibit distinct age-specific capacities for proliferation and activation. We hypothesized that HIV-infected naive CD4+ T cell populations in children on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) would thus be distinct from infected memory cells. METHODS. Peripheral blood naive and memory CD4+ T cells from 8 children with perinatal HIV on ART initiated at age 1.7–17 months were isolated by FACS. DNA was extracted from sorted cells, and HIV proviruses were counted, evaluated for intactness, and subjected to integration site analysis (ISA). RESULTS. Naive CD4+ T cells containing HIV proviruses were detected in children with 95% statistical confidence. A median 4.7% of long terminal repeat–containing naive CD4+ T cells also contained HIV genetic elements consistent with intactness. Full-length proviral sequencing confirmed intactness of 1 provirus. In the participant with the greatest degree of naive cell infection, ISA revealed infected expanded cell clones in both naive and memory T cells, with no common HIV integration sites detected between subsets. Divergent integration site profiles reflected differential gene expression patterns of naive and memory T cells. CONCLUSION. These results demonstrate that HIV persisted in both naive and memory CD4+ T cells that underwent clonal expansion and harbored intact proviruses, and suggest that infected memory T cell clones do not frequently arise from naive cell differentiation in children with perinatal HIV on long-term ART.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katusiime, M. G., Neer, V., Guo, S., Patro, S. C., Wang, W., Luke, B., … Kearney, M. F. (2025). Divergent populations of HIV-infected naive and memory CD4+ T cell clones in children on antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 135(9). https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI188533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free