Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: A social relations analysis

55Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Men and women rated the physical attractiveness of other men and women who were sitting nearby and were rated by them in return. They also provided meta-perceptions of how they thought those others rated them. Attractiveness ratings were partly a function of both the target being rated and the perceiver providing the ratings regardless of the sex of the perceiver or target, but the highest levels of consensus occurred when men judged the attractiveness of women and the highest levels of idiosyncrasy occurred when men rated other men. Meta-perceptions were also idiosyncratic; some believed that they were consistently considered attractive, whereas others thought they were seen as unattractive. People were aware of what others thought of them and, in particular, women's meta-perceptions were highly related to men's judgments of them. People agree about others' attractiveness, and those who are attractive to others know they are pretty or handsome. © 2003 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marcus, D. K., & Miller, R. S. (2003, March). Sex differences in judgments of physical attractiveness: A social relations analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250193

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free