Concurrent zero-knowledge with timing, revisited

2Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Following Dwork, Naor, and Sahai (30th STOC, 1998), we consider concurrent executions of protocols in a semi-synchronized network. Specifically, we assume that each party holds a local clock such that bounds on the relative rates of these clocks as well as on the messagedelivery time are a-priori known, and consider protocols that employ time-driven operations (i.e., time-out in-coming messages and delay out-going messages). We show that the constant-round zero-knowledge proof for NP of Goldreich and Kahan (Jour, of Crypto., 1996) preserves its security when polynomially-many independent copies are executed concurrently under the above timing model. We stress that our main result refers to zero-knowledge of interactive proofs, whereas the results of Dwork et. al. are either for zero-knowledge arguments or for a weak notion of zero-knowledge (called epsilon-knowledge) proofs. Our analysis identifies two extreme schedulings of concurrent executions under the above timing model: the first is the case of parallel execution of polynomially-many copies, and the second is of concurrent execution of polynomially-many copies such that only a small (i.e., constant) number of copies axe simultaneously active at any time (i.e., bounded simultaneity). Dealing with each of these extreme cases is of independent interest, and the general result (regarding concurrent executions under the timing model) is obtained by combining the two treatments. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldreich, O. (2006). Concurrent zero-knowledge with timing, revisited. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3895 LNCS, 27–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/11685654_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free