How fit turns into misfit and back: Institutional transformations of pastoral commons in African floodplains

65Citations
Citations of this article
106Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We enlarge the notion of institutional fit using theoretical approaches from New Institutionalism, including rational choice and strategic action, political ecology and constructivist approaches. These approaches are combined with ecological approaches (system and evolutionary ecology) focusing on feedback loops and change. We offer results drawn from a comparison of fit and misfit cases of institutional change in pastoral commons in four African floodplain contexts (Zambia, Cameroon, Tanzania (two cases). Cases of precolonial fit and misfit in the postcolonial past, as well as a case of institutional fit in the postcolonial phase, highlight important features, specifically, flexible institutions, leadership, and mutual economic benefit under specific relations of bargaining power of actors. We argue that only by combining otherwise conflicting approaches can we come to understand why institutional fit develops into misfit and back again. © 2013 by the author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haller, T., Fokou, G., Mbeyale, G., & Meroka, P. (2013). How fit turns into misfit and back: Institutional transformations of pastoral commons in African floodplains. Ecology and Society, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05510-180134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free