Abstract
We estimate that 13.6% of all option grants to top executives during the period 1996-2005 were backdated or otherwise manipulated. Our study primarily focuses on grants that were unscheduled and at-themoney, of which we estimate that 18.9% were manipulated. The fraction is 23.0% before the new two-day filing requirement took effect on August 29, 2002, and 10.0% afterward. For the minority of grants that are not filed within the required two-day window, the fraction of manipulated grants remains as high as 19.9%. We further find a higher frequency of manipulation among tech firms, small firms, and firms with high stock price volatility. In addition, firms that use smaller (non-big-five) auditing firms are more likely to file their grants late. Finally, at the firm level, we estimate that 29.2% of firms manipulated grants to top executives at some point between 1996 and 2005. © 2009 INFORMS.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Heron, R. A., & Lie, E. (2009). What fraction of stock option grants to top executives have been backdated or manipulated? Management Science, 55(4), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0958
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.