All Claims Are Representative Claims: Response to Thomás Zicman de Barros

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This response to Thomás Zicman de Barros argues that so-called post-representative movements do not avoid representation as speaking for. A deconstructive reading of Gayatri Spivak's distinction between Darstellung and Vertretung shows that, while they cannot be reduced to one another, they nonetheless imply one another. As a result, post-representative movements such as the 2013 Brazilian Jornadas de Junho movement do not escape representation as speaking-for.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomassen, L. (2022). All Claims Are Representative Claims: Response to Thomás Zicman de Barros. Representation, 58(2), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.1931952

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free