Job insecurity: Mediator or moderator of the relationship between type of contract and various outcomes?

  • De Cuyper N
  • De Witte H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research on the consequences of job insecurity among temporary workers has been largely exploratory. This study investigates whether job insecurity either mediates or moderates the relationship between type of contract (temporary versus permanent) and its outcomes. It extends previous research by including a wide range of outcomes (job satisfaction, engagement, organisational commitment, trust, general health, irritation, turnover intention, performance, and positive work life interference), most of which have not yet been considered in this context. Results (N = 656) point to the moderating role of job insecurity, however only for outcomes reflecting immediate reactions. Implications for future research are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Cuyper, N., & De Witte, H. (2005). Job insecurity: Mediator or moderator of the relationship between type of contract and various outcomes? SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v31i4.211

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free