Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke

284Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) may be present within a subset of patients with presumed cryptogenic TIA or stroke and remains undetected by standard diagnostic methods. We hypothesized that AF may be an under-recognized mechanism for cryptogenic TIA/stroke. Methods: A consecutive series of 56 patients with cryptogenic TIA/stroke was analyzed after diagnostic evaluation and Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MCOT) for up to 21 days. Demographic, radiographic, echocardiographic, and MCOT results were reviewed. Predictors of AF detection by MCOT were determined by univariate analysis including Student t test and Fisher exact tests and multivariate analysis. Results: The median MCOT monitoring duration was 21 (range 5-21) days resulting in an AF detection rate of 23% (13/56). AF was first detected after a median of 7 (range 2-19) days of monitoring. Twenty-seven asymptomatic AF episodes were detected in the 13 patients, of which 85% (23/27) were <30 seconds and the remaining 15% (4/27) were 4-24 hours in duration. Diabetes was predictive of AF detection by both univariate (p = 0.024) and multivariate analysis (OR 6.15; 95% CI 1.16 to 32.73; p = 0.033). Conclusions: There is a high rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection by Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (21 days) in patients with cryptogenic TIA/stroke that may be related to extended monitoring duration, patient selection, and inclusion of all new onset AF episodes. Brief AF episodes (<30 seconds) may be biomarkers of more prolonged and clinically significant AF. © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tayal, A. H., Tian, M., Kelly, K. M., Jones, S. C., Wright, D. G., Singh, D., … Gupta, R. (2008). Atrial fibrillation detected by mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry in cryptogenic TIA or stroke. Neurology, 71(21), 1696–1701. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000325059.86313.31

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free