Catheter Interventions for Pulmonary Embolism: Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Thrombolytics

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism is a debilitating and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by high mortality and long-term adverse outcomes. Traditional treatment options are fraught with serious bleeding risks and incomplete thrombus removal, necessitating the development of innovative treatment strategies. While new interventional approaches offer promising potential for improved outcomes with fewer serious complications, their rapid development and need for more comparative clinical evidence makes it challenging for physicians to select the optimal treatment for each patient among the many options. This review summarizes the current published clinical data for both traditional treatments and more recent interventional approaches indicated for pulmonary embolism. While published studies thus far suggest that these newer interventional devices offer safe and effective options, more data is needed to understand their impact relative to the standard of care. The studies in progress that are anticipated to provide needed evidence are reviewed here since they will be critical for helping physicians make informed treatment choices and potentially driving necessary guideline changes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mouawad, N. J. (2024). Catheter Interventions for Pulmonary Embolism: Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Thrombolytics. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal. Houston Methodist Debakey Heart and Vascular Center. https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free