Revisions and extension of the Hohenheim oak and pine chronologies: New evidence about the timing of the younger dryas/preboreal transition

96Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Oak and pine samples housed at the Institute of Botany, University of Hohenheim, are the backbone of the early Holocene part of the radiocarbon calibration curve, published in 1993 (Becker 1993; Kromer and Becker 1993; Stuiver and Becker 1993; Vogel et al. 1993). Since then the chronologies have been revised. The revisions include 1) the discovery of 41 missing years in the oak chronology and 2) a shift of 54 yr for the oldest part back into the past. The oak chronology was also extended with new samples as far back as 10,429 BP (8480 BC). In addition, the formerly tentatively dated pine chronology (Becker 1993) has been rebuilt and shifted to an earlier date. It is now positioned by 14C matching at 11,871-9900 BP (9922-7951 BC) with an uncertainty of ±20 yr (Kromer and Spurk 1998). With these new chronologies the 14C calibration curve can now be corrected, eliminating the discrepancy in the dating of the Younger Dryas/Preboreal transition between the proxy data of the GRIP and GISP ice cores (Johnsen et al. 1992; Taylor et al. 1993), the varve chronology of Lake Gosciaz (Goslar et al. 1995) and the pine chronology (Becker, Kromer and Trimborn 1991).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spurk, M., Friedrich, M., Hofmann, J., Remmele, S., Frenzel, B., Leuschner, H. H., & Kromer, B. (1998). Revisions and extension of the Hohenheim oak and pine chronologies: New evidence about the timing of the younger dryas/preboreal transition. Radiocarbon, 40(3), 1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200019159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free