Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis not due to noncompliance but to between-patient pharmacokinetic variability

247Citations
Citations of this article
298Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. It is believed that nonadherence is the proximate cause of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-tuberculosis) emergence. The level of nonadherence associated with emergence of MDR-tuberculosis is unknown. Performance of a randomized controlled trial in which some patients are randomized to nonadherence would be unethical; therefore, other study designs should be utilized. Methods. We performed hollow fiber studies for both bactericidal and sterilizing effect, with inoculum spiked with 0.5% rifampin-and isoniazid-resistant isogenic strains in some experiments. Standard therapy was administered daily for 28-56 days, with extents of nonadherence varying between 0% and 100%. Sizes of drug-resistant populations were compared using analysis of variance. We also explored the effect of pharmacokinetic variability on MDR-tuberculosis emergence using computer-aided clinical trial simulations of 10000 Cape Town, South Africa, tuberculosis patients. Results. Therapy failure was only encountered at extents of nonadherence ≥60%. Surprisingly, isoniazid-and rifampin-resistant populations did not achieve ≥1% proportion in any experiment and did not achieve a higher proportion with nonadherence. However, clinical trial simulations demonstrated that approximately 1% of tuberculosis patients with perfect adherence would still develop MDR-tuberculosis due to pharmacokinetic variability alone. Conclusions. These data, based on a preclinical model, demonstrate that nonadherence alone is not a sufficient condition for MDR-tuberculosis emergence. © 2011 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Srivastava, S., Pasipanodya, J. G., Meek, C., Leff, R., & Gumbo, T. (2011). Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis not due to noncompliance but to between-patient pharmacokinetic variability. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 204(12), 1951–1959. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir658

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free