Evidence for continuous glucose monitoring: Sufficient for reimbursement?

18Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Evidence for continuous glucose monitoring is mounting. Meta-analyses consistently show lowering of HbA1c, and the first trial reporting a reduction in severe hypoglycaemic events in patients with hypoglycaemia unawareness has recently been presented. The more recent trials studied larger numbers of patients and may have shown better results because of improved technology. The various combinations of pump and sensor, with automated bolus calculators and low glucose suspend features, make evaluation more challenging from a reimbursement point of view, but evidence seems convincing enough to justify reimbursement for selected patient groups, including those who have shown a substantial improvement in HbA1c during a trial period, and those with hypoglycaemia unawareness who encountered severe hypoglycaemia in the recent past. More data on cost-efficacy are needed. © 2013 Diabetes UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heinemann, L., & Devries, J. H. (2014). Evidence for continuous glucose monitoring: Sufficient for reimbursement? Diabetic Medicine, 31(2), 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free