Effects of a CrossFit Training Program on Body Composition and Physical Fitness in Novice and Advanced Practitioners: An Inter-Individual Analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: CrossFit® has become a popular and effective training methodology. This study aimed to compare the effects of a four-week CrossFit training program and analyze the inter-individual variability on body composition (fat mass and fat-free mass) and physical fitness (push-ups, military press, back squat, deadlift, countermovement jump (CMJ), sit-ups, and 30 m sprint speed) in novice and advanced practitioners. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used, with single-blinded (evaluators) and 2 parallel groups: novices (n = 10; age = 22.30 ± 0.81) and advanced practitioners (n = 11; age = 22.80 ± 1.41). The intervention consisted of 3 weekly 75 min sessions (4 weeks), with pre- and post-assessments. A two-factor mixed ANOVA and inter-individual analyses to classify responders (Rs) and non-responders (NRs) were performed. Results: No significant interaction effects were found. However, the novice group significantly improved back squat performance (p = 0.031). Inter-individual analysis showed higher proportions of Rs in the novice group for back squat (40%), deadlift (20%), military press (10%), CMJ (10%), sit-ups (30%), push-ups (30%), and 30 m sprint speed (10%) compared to the advanced group. Conclusions: CrossFit program did not significantly affect body composition, but novices exhibited significant back squat improvements. Considering experience levels can enhance training outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aravena-Sagardia, P., Barramuño-Medina, M., Vásquez, B. P., Pichinao Pichinao, S., Sepúlveda, P. R., Herrera-Valenzuela, T., … Valdés-Badilla, P. (2025). Effects of a CrossFit Training Program on Body Composition and Physical Fitness in Novice and Advanced Practitioners: An Inter-Individual Analysis. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073554

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free