Comparison of different methods for extracting the astaxanthin from haematococcus pluvialis: Chemical composition and biological activity

18Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, the impact of different cell disruption techniques (high-pressure micro fluidization (HPMF), ionic liquids (ILs), multi-enzyme (ME), and hydrochloric acid (HCl)) on the chemical composition and biological activity of astaxanthin (AST) obtained from Haematococcus pluvialis was investigated. Results indicated that all cell disruption techniques had a significant effect on AST composition, which were confirmed by TLC and UPC2 analysis. AST recovery from HCl (HCl-AST) and ILs (ILs-AST) cell disruption techniques was dominant by free and monoesters AST, while AST recovery from HPMF (HPMF-AST) and ME (ME-AST) cell disruption techniques was composed of monoesters, diesters, and free AST. Further biological activity analysis displayed that HCl-AST showed the highest ABTS and DPPH activity, while ILs-AST showed better results against the ORAC assay. Additionally, ILs-AST exhibits a stronger anti-proliferation of HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner, which was ascribed to AST-induced ROS in to inhibit the proliferative of cancer cells.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tan, Y., Ye, Z., Wang, M., Manzoor, M. F., Aadil, R. M., Tan, X., & Liu, Z. (2021). Comparison of different methods for extracting the astaxanthin from haematococcus pluvialis: Chemical composition and biological activity. Molecules, 26(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123569

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free