Legal gap in legal protection for aggrieved parties at the precontractual stage

  • Banaba H
  • Susilowati T
  • Sejati H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research explores the legal gaps and ambiguities surrounding the principle of good faith in pre-contractual stages, as outlined in Article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata). While the principle of good faith is foundational in contract law, its unclear application during negotiations has led to legal uncertainty, potentially disadvantaging parties acting honestly and transparently. The study highlights the need for robust legal frameworks to protect parties from unfair practices and fraudulent actions during the negotiation process. Employing a normative legal research method, the analysis identifies inadequacies in existing regulations and proposes practical reforms, including clearer legal doctrines and amendments to the Civil Code. The findings underscore the importance of good faith at all stages of contractual agreements to foster transparency, fairness, and trust in business relationships, while minimizing disputes and enhancing market integrity. Recommendations for future research include comparative studies on international good faith practices, sector-specific applications, and the integration of technological tools to enforce accountability in pre-contractual negotiations. This work contributes to the development of sustainable and equitable business practices within Indonesian law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Banaba, H., Susilowati, T., & Sejati, H. (2024). Legal gap in legal protection for aggrieved parties at the precontractual stage. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 4(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v4i2.1028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free