Efficacy and safety of PAIR for cystic echinococcosis: Experience on a large series of patients from Bulgaria

54Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We report our experience with puncture, aspiration, injection, and reaspiration (PAIR) for the treatment of cystic echinococcosis in Bulgaria. PAIR was performed in 230 patients with 348 echinococcal cysts. At 12-month follow-up, 77.6% of the cysts, all cystic echinococcosis (CE) 1 and CE3a cysts according to the World Health Organization Informal Working Group classification, showed various degrees of obliteration. In 11.5% of cysts, all of which were > 10 cm-type CEI, a significant amount of fluid persisted, and they were punctured again. Of those, 16 (4.6%) contained protoscolices and were treated by a second PAIR. The remaining 24 (6.9%) cysts were treated by simple aspiration or drainage. No significant reduction in size and no changes in the structure were observed in 10.9% of cysts, all of which were classified as CE2 or CE3b. Complications developed in 25.2% of patients, including severe anaphylactic reaction in two (0.9%) patients. Our experience confirms that PAIR is a successful first-choice treatment when a stage-specific approach is taken. Copyright © 2011 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Golemanov, B., Grigorov, N., Mitova, R., Genov, J., Vuchev, D., Tamarozzi, F., & Brunetti, E. (2011). Efficacy and safety of PAIR for cystic echinococcosis: Experience on a large series of patients from Bulgaria. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 84(1), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free