The impact of surgical timing on visual outcome in pituitary apoplexy: Literature review and case illustration

27Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Neuro-ophthalmologic signs are common clinical manifestations of pituitary apoplexy. Managing sudden visual loss is critical for achieving a good outcome. The timing of pituitary surgery remains controversial. In fact, various points of view have been reported in the literature. Methods: We reviewed the impact of surgical intervention timing on visual outcome. The surgical intervention time was classified as urgent, early, intermediate, and late interventions based on the literature review. We report a case of a 40-year-old male patient who presented with headache and sudden visual loss for 3 days. He was diagnosed with pituitary apoplexy and had transnasal-transsphenoidal resection. Three days later, he achieved a complete recovery of his vision. Results: This paper is an addition to several studies that favor early surgical decompression of pituitary fossa for apoplexy cases with severe neuro-ophthalmologic involvement. There is an increasing trend for early surgical intervention for pituitary apoplexy in the literature, especially for severe visual deterioration. Conclusion: The visual outcome appears to be better in early intervention as compared to late. Nevertheless, good visual recovery is also seen in late surgical intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdulbaki, A., & Kanaan, I. (2017). The impact of surgical timing on visual outcome in pituitary apoplexy: Literature review and case illustration. Surgical Neurology International. Medknow Publications. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.199557

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free