Thymectomy may not be associated with clinical improvement in MuSK myasthenia gravis

78Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: A randomized trial demonstrated benefit from thymectomy in nonthymomatous acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-antibody positive myasthenia gravis (MG). Uncontrolled observational and histologic studies suggest thymectomy may not be efficacious in anti–muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)-MG. Methods: The therapeutic impact of thymectomy was evaluated from data collected for a multicenter, retrospective blinded review of rituximab in MuSK-MG. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between thymectomy (n = 26) and nonthymectomy (n = 29) groups, including treatment with rituximab (42% vs. 45%). At last visit, 35% of thymectomy subjects reached the primary endpoint, a Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status (PIS) score of minimal manifestations (MM) or better, compared with 55% of controls (P = 0.17). After controlling for age at onset of MG, rituximab, prednisone, and intravenous immunoglobulin/plasma exchange treatment, thymectomy was not associated with greater likelihood of favorable clinical outcome (odds ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.12–1.53, P = 0.19). Discussion: Thymectomy was not associated with additional clinical improvement in this multicenter cohort of MuSK-MG patients. Muscle Nerve 59:404–410, 2019.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clifford, K. M., Hobson-Webb, L. D., Benatar, M., Burns, T. M., Barnett, C., Silvestri, N. J., … Hehir, M. K. (2019, April 1). Thymectomy may not be associated with clinical improvement in MuSK myasthenia gravis. Muscle and Nerve. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26404

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free