Transdisciplinary stakeholder understandings of antimicrobial resistance: An integrative approach in Aotearoa New Zealand

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex public health issue, with a range of influences across human, animal, and environmental health. Given the complexity of the problem, the diversity of stakeholders, and the failure of current policies to curb AMR worldwide, integrative approaches are needed to identify effective actions. Underpinned by systems thinking and One Health principles, this qualitative study explored how diverse AMR experts in Aotearoa New Zealand perceive the main drivers and effects of AMR. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with clinical, academic, policy, community, and industry representatives were designed to elicit mental models of the causes and outcomes of AMR across dimensions. Results: Thematic analysis revealed contrasting understandings of AMR causes across four domains: food-producing animals (livestock), healthcare, community, and environment. AMR was often framed as a problem of individual behaviour, despite many implicit references to underlying structural economic influences. The politics of collaboration was a further major underlying theme. The interviews highlighted fundamental connections between AMR and other complex issues, including poverty and environmental pollution. Implications for public health: This study brings together the understandings of AMR of transdisciplinary stakeholders, providing some immediate insights for policy makers and setting the foundation for developing a collaborative system model of AMR as a basis for decision-making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchell, S., Macmillan, A., Morgaine, K. C., & Priest, P. (2023). Transdisciplinary stakeholder understandings of antimicrobial resistance: An integrative approach in Aotearoa New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free