Patients' ‘thingification’, unexplained symptoms and response-ability in the clinical context: in response to ‘Patients' substantialization of disease, the hybrid symptom and the metaphysical care’, by Alexandra Parvan

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The types of diseases, or categories of suffering, referred to as medically unexplained symptoms or syndromes (MUS) are the focus for the following commentary. Such cases seem to invite reflection. The very nature of such complex patterns of disease and suffering raises a number of fundamental epistemological and ontological issues. Furthermore, such health challenges can serve as the basis for an exploration of how the suffering person as well as the medical caretaker comes to grip with disease, incapacitation or suffering. We have structured our comments into two parts: first, we will describe medically unexplained health problems as the background for an inquiry into a process wherein patients reify their suffering in order to meet their doctors on equal terms, which carries a potential for alienation. Second, we will reflect on Alexandra Parvan's text as regards patients' ‘substantialization’ of their disease, the resulting ‘hybrid symptom’ and a proposed model for care and healing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eriksen, T. E., & Kirkengen, A. L. (2016). Patients’ ‘thingification’, unexplained symptoms and response-ability in the clinical context: in response to ‘Patients’’ substantialization of disease, the hybrid symptom and the metaphysical care’, by Alexandra Parvan.’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 22(4), 622–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12430

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free