Concurrent validity and intertester reliability of universal and fluid-based goniometers for active elbow range of motion

45Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purposes of this study were 1) to establish the concurrent validity of the universal goniometer and the fluid-based goniometer and 2) to determine the intertester reliability of these two instruments. A correlational study was performed in which two testers used the universal goniometer and the fluid-based goniometer in measuring elbow range of motion in 30 healthy subjects. The fluid-based goniometer had high intertester reliability (R = .92), and the standard goniometer had poor reliability (R = .53). The Pearson product-moment correlation between the two instruments was .83. A significant difference was shown between the standard goniometer and the fluid-based goniometer by the t test (t = 4.4, df = 28, p < .05). The results support the use of the fluid-based goniometer between testers on elbow range of motion; however, the two instruments cannot be used interchangeably.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petherick, M., Rheault, W., Kimble, S., Lechner, C., & Senear, V. (1988). Concurrent validity and intertester reliability of universal and fluid-based goniometers for active elbow range of motion. Physical Therapy, 68(6), 966–969. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/68.6.966

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free