Effectiveness and safety of treat-to-target strategy for methotrexate-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients >75 years of age

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify differences in effectiveness and safety of a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy comparing late-onset MTX-naïve RA patients (LORA) ≥75 or <75 years of age. Methods: Treatment was adjusted to target low disease activity with conventional synthetic DMARDs followed by biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in LORA ≥75 years (n ¼ 98, mean age 80.0 years) and LORA <75 years (n ¼ 99) with moderate–high disease activity. Achievement of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission at week 156 by non-responder imputation analysis was evaluated as a primary outcome. Results: LORA ≥75 years had more comorbidities than LORA <75 years, but SDAI and ACPA positivity were similar at baseline. Of the LORA ≥75 years, 70.4% started MTX and 34.1% and 37.1% received a bDMARD at week 52 and 156, respectively (very similar to the LORA <75 years). Glucocorticoid use was more frequent in the LORA ≥75 years than in the LORA <75 years. Comorbidities/adverse events more frequently contributed to the reasons for non-adherence to T2T in the LORA ≥75 than in the LORA <75. At week 156, 32.7% of the LORA ≥75 and 66.7% of the LORA <75 achieved SDAI remission (P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) over 156 weeks was 42.8% in the LORA ≥75 and 22.1% in the LORA <75. Multivariable analysis indicated an increased risk of SDAI non-remission at week 156 in the LORA ≥75 [odds ratio 2.82 (95% CI 1.29. 6.14)] after adjusting for comorbidities at baseline, non-adherence to T2T and SAEs. Conclusions: It was more difficult to achieve remission in the LORA ≥75 patients than in the LORA <75 patients due to both poor treatment response and safety issues. Lay Summary What does this mean for patients? The proportion of patients ≥75 years of age with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is increasing. However, it is not known whether a standard treatment strategy with the goal of low disease activity (i.e. where your symptoms are under control) would be beneficial in people with late-onset RA. Late-onset RA is where people develop RA at >60 years of age. Our study investigated the effectiveness and safety of treatment in people ≥75 years of age with late-onset RA. We found that this age group had more comorbidities (i.e. where a person has more than one disease at the same time) than people ages 60–74 years. Comorbidities and other medical problems prevented optimal treatment in the ≥75 group more so than in the 60- to 74-year group. Despite similar disease activity when starting treatment, only 32.7% of the ≥75 group were in remission (i.e. had very few or no RA symptoms) after 3 years of treatment, compared with 66.7% of the 60- to 74-year age group. Serious medical problems were more common in the ≥75 group. Our findings suggest that a poorer response to treatment and a higher rate of serious medical problems make it more challenging for people ≥75 years of age to reach remission. We need to consider and address optimal treatment strategies for this group of people in the near future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsumoto, T., Sugihara, T., Hosoya, T., Ishizaki, T., Kubo, K., Kamiya, M., … Harigai, M. (2024). Effectiveness and safety of treat-to-target strategy for methotrexate-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients >75 years of age. Rheumatology Advances in Practice, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free