Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: The need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring

6Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to improve survival outcomes after cardiac arrest. The current standard in studies evaluating CPR quality is to measure CPR process measures—for example, chest compression rate, depth, and fraction. Published studies evaluating CPR feedback devices have yielded mixed results. Newer approaches that seek to optimize CPR by measuring physiological endpoints during the resuscitation may lead to individualized patient care and improved patient outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, S., & Scales, D. C. (2016, June 28). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: The need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring. Critical Care. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1371-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free