Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review

18Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Only a few studies have assessed smell and taste in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with psychophysical tests, while the majority performed self-rating evaluations. Given the heterogeneity of the published literature, the aim of this review was to systemati-cally analyse the articles on this topic with a focus on psychophysical testing. A search on PubMed and Web of Science from December 2019, to November 2021, with cross-refer-ences, was executed. The main eligibility criteria were English-language articles, investi-gating the clinical features of olfaction and gustation in COVID-19 patients using self-rat-ing assessment, psychophysical testing and imaging techniques. A total of 638 articles were identified and 66 were included. Self-rating assessment was performed in 31 studies, while psychophysical testing in 30 and imaging techniques in 5. The prevalence of chemosensory dysfunction was the most investigated topic, followed by the recovery time. About the psy-chophysical assessment, the extended version of the Sniffin’ Sticks was used in 11 articles and the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test in another 11. The olfactory threshold performance was the most impacted compared to the discrimination and identification capacities in accordance with the hypothesis of a tropism of SARS-CoV-2 for the olfactory mucosa. The timing significantly influenced the results of the psychophysical testing with 20% of patients presenting olfactory dysfunction at one month after infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trecca, E. M. C., Cassano, M., Longo, F., Petrone, P., Miani, C., Hummel, T., & Gelardi, M. (2022). Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. Pacini Editore S.p.A./AU-CNS. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-42-2022-03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free