Public Private Partnerships and the Public Interest: A Case Study of Ottawa’s Lansdowne Park Development

7Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Public private partnerships (PPPs) are increasingly advocated as beneficial for the delivery of public services, facilities, and infrastructure for municipal governments. However, such partnerships often raise serious concerns about transparency and accountability. While municipal governments across Canada have tried to increase public participation in local affairs, PPPs can impede such efforts. This article presents a case study of the Lansdowne Park PPP redevelopment in the City of Ottawa. We focus on how transparency and citizen engagement have been compromised and circumvented and link to broader issues of how to balance the privileged status of business and the demands for commercial confidentiality with the public interest, transparency, and citizen engagement in projects that use PPPs. The article concludes by arguing that some projects and some conditions can render the use of PPPs inappropriate and counterproductive in terms of both effectiveness and the basic principles of good governance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krawchenko, T., & Stoney, C. (2011). Public Private Partnerships and the Public Interest: A Case Study of Ottawa’s Lansdowne Park Development. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 2(2), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2011v2n2a92

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free