COMPARING ASPIRIN, ENOXAPARIN, AND RIVAROXABAN POST PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN SAUDI ARABIA

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery are at significantly high risk for VTE, and therefore the routine use of thromboprophylaxis has been standard-of-care for several years. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes for aspirin, enoxaparin, and rivaroxaban post primary total knee replacement surgery. Method: This is a prospective observational study that is done in two medical centers in Saudi Arabia. A prospective data collection sheet was used to follow up each patient for 35 days' post-surgery. Results: In this study, 242 patients were included with a response rate of 87.86% (242/276), according to the type of Extended VTE Prophylaxis medications patients were divided on 3 groups; Enoxaparin 85/242 (35.1 %), Rivaroxaban 128/242 (52.9 %), Aspirin 29/242 (12.0 %). Conclusion: In this study, rivaroxaban has the worst profile, in both having the highest number of DVT cases, as well as 2 minor bleeding cases. Aspirin group patients have the best profile in terms of complications and recovery measures post-surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alameri, M. A., Sulaiman, S. A. B. S., Ashour, A. M. D. T., & Al-Saati, M. F. (2021). COMPARING ASPIRIN, ENOXAPARIN, AND RIVAROXABAN POST PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN SAUDI ARABIA. Azerbaijan Pharmaceutical and Pharmacotherapy Journal, 21(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.33545/26647222.2021.v3.i1a.66

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free