Abstract
Most political regimes in the world today display some form of mixture of democratic and autocratic institutional features—they are hybrid regimes. This chapter distils from the literature the defining characteristics, commonly discussed types, and causes of transformations of hybrid regimes. It demonstrates how all hybrid regime concepts can be sorted into either one of the two categories of defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism ; how all hybrid regime concepts are constructed along the two institutional dimensions of electoralism and constitutionalism ; and how explanations of hybrid regime persistence and change fall into four categories: electoralist, nested game approaches, neo-institutional, and non-electoral explanations.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Schmotz, A. (2019). Hybrid Regimes. In The Handbook of Political, Social, and Economic Transformation (pp. 521–525). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829911.003.0053
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.