Uterine artery embolization: A safe and effective, minimally invasive, uterine-sparing treatment option for symptomatic fibroids

15Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Leiomyomas (or fibroids) are exceedingly common lesions. The indications to initiate treatment are based on the symptoms that can arise from their presence. In general, medical therapy should be considered the first line of treatment. Currently, the treatment of fibroids is in evolution. Since uterine artery embolization (UAE) was first described by Ravina et al in 1995, it has been shown to be a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective alternative to traditional surgical options, with data from long-term studies now available. Appropriate patient evaluation and selection are vital; the ideal candidate is one who is premenopausal, has symptomatic fibroids resistant to medical therapy, no longer desires fertility, and wishes to maintain her uterus. Uterine artery embolization is primarily an angiographic procedure, but periprocedural clinical management is critical for patient satisfaction. This article discusses the various embolic materials that are commonly used and available for UAE; understanding the technical nuances is critical for long-term success.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vo, N. J., & Andrews, R. T. (2008). Uterine artery embolization: A safe and effective, minimally invasive, uterine-sparing treatment option for symptomatic fibroids. Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 25(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1085923

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free