A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis

10Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background:Adverse outcomes after unilateral vs bilateral breast reconstruction involve an unknown level of risk that warrants thorough investigation.Methods:To address this research need, PubMed, Ovid, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched through systematically from January 1, 1990, to January 1, 2019 to retrieve the relevant studies on the risk of postoperative complications after unilateral vs bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction. According to the pre-designed inclusion criteria, available data were extracted from the relevant studies, and then analyzed comparatively in order to identify the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) applying either a random or a fixed effects model.Results:Eventually, 20 studies involving 8122 female subjects met the inclusion criteria. It was found that unilateral reconstruction involved a significantly higher risk of flap loss (RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.21-2.00; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cao, Z., Cao, J., Pang, X., Du, W., & Wu, P. (2020, September 11). A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free