Justice at Nuremberg? Jewish Responses to Nazi War-Crime Trials in Allied-Occupied Germany

  • Jockusch
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article deals with the place of the oriental Jewish immigrant question within the matrix of policy debates and political dilemmas faced by Mapai in the early years of the state. Its main argument is that conflicts over the oriental Jewish immigrant question were, in part, a manifestation of a conflict-ridden political culture, which fluctuated between two poles: centralism and egalitarianism. Alongside support and endorsements of a policy that would encourage paternalism, dependency, and patronage in the rela- tionship between the government and the country’s new immigrants, we can also find clear, well-articulated, and not infrequent protests against the promotion of passivity in political life. These oppositional voices sought to advance a distinct vision of their own that called for giving real political power to immigrants in order to transform them from a

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jockusch. (2012). Justice at Nuremberg? Jewish Responses to Nazi War-Crime Trials in Allied-Occupied Germany. Jewish Social Studies, 19(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.2979/jewisocistud.19.1.107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free