Circumstances relating to interlocking directorates in Italy: An exploratory study

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite a large body of research in the management, accounting, economics, and finance literatures, the relationship between board composition and firm performance is still controversial and ripe for debate (for a recent study, see Boone et al., 2004). Utilizing the theoretical approach of Zahra and Pearce (1989) that identifies the three key roles of the board as oversight, strategy, and service, we examine the effects of having board interlocks between an industrial firm and of financial services firm, and firm characteristics. Using publicly available data on all listed Italian firms for the year 2001, we find that for industrial firms, there is a positive relationship between the number of board interlocks with a bank and current year return on assets, however, the opposite is true for financial services firms. Finally, we find no relationship between interlocking directorates with banks and firm capital structure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Markarian, G., Parbonetti, A., & Previts, G. J. (2006). Circumstances relating to interlocking directorates in Italy: An exploratory study. Corporate Ownership and Control, 4(2 B), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv4i2c1p4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free