Context and Literality in Idiom Processing: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading

12Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a self-paced reading study, we investigated how effects of biasing contexts in idiom processing interact with effects of idiom literality. Specifically, we tested if idioms with a high potential for literal interpretation (e.g., break the ice) are processed differently in figuratively and literally biasing contexts than idioms with a low potential (e.g., lose one’s cool). Participants read sentences that biased towards a figurative or literal reading of idioms and continued with resolutions that were congruent or incongruent with these biases (e.g., [The new schoolboy/the chilly Eskimo] just wanted to break the ice [with his peers/on the lake]…). While interpretations of high-literality idioms were strengthened by supporting contexts and showed costs for incongruent resolutions, low-literality idioms did not show this effect. Rather, interpreting low-literality idioms in a literal manner showed a cost regardless of context. We conclude that biasing contexts are used in a flexible process of real-time idiom processing and meaning constitution, but this effect is mediated by idiom literality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beck, S. D., & Weber, A. (2020). Context and Literality in Idiom Processing: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(5), 837–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09719-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free