Differential vulnerability in coastal communities: Evidence and lessons learned from two deltas

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Flood risk management requires a sound understanding and assessment of flood vulnerability of society and households. A key issue in assessing flood vulnerability is its differential nature: not all people and communities are equally vulnerable to flooding, even if they live in the same hazard zone. The concept of differential vulnerability is illustrated by two case studies with a more or less comparable physical environment but entirely different socio-economic setting: New Orleans in the Mississippi Delta, USA and the Godavari Delta in coastal Andhra Pradesh, India. The results of this comparison show that in both countries the less advantageous sections of society are the most vulnerable. However, macro-economic resilience tends to be greater in India than in the United States. Both examples show that vulnerability is intricately entangled with the fabric of social life itself, with politics, power, history and environment. Reducing vulnerability to flooding therefore requires an integrated approach taking into account not only aspects of disaster management but also of equitable development. © 2008 WIT Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marchand, M. (2008). Differential vulnerability in coastal communities: Evidence and lessons learned from two deltas. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 118, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.2495/FRIAR080271

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free