Characterizing landscape spatial structure can provide insights about the underlying mechanisms that generate pattern. Quantifying spatial structure enables analysis of landscape change over time as well as comparisons among different locations. Although numerous landscape metrics (LMs) exist to quantify spatial structure and characterize a landscape, how do we know when two landscapes significantly differ? As a single landscape represents only one replicate, its metrics are not statistics; thus, testing for differences between two landscapes becomes difficult. To address this problem, randomization procedures can help assess statistical significance using simulation approaches that assess whether the observed spatial structure could have occurred by chance alone. In this chapter, exercises will allow students to accomplish the following objectives.
CITATION STYLE
Remmel, T. K., & Fortin, M.-J. (2017). What Constitutes a Significant Difference in Landscape Pattern? In Learning Landscape Ecology (pp. 105–125). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6374-4_7
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.