Male sex and the risk of childhood cancer: The mediating effect of birth defects

9Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is a persistent, unexplained disparity in sex ratio among childhood cancer cases, whereby males are more likely to develop most cancers. This male predominance is also seen for most birth defects, which are strongly associated with risk of childhood cancer. We conducted mediation analysis to estimate whether the increased risk of cancer among males is partially explained by birth defect status. Methods: We used a population-based birth cohort with linked data from birth certificates, birth defects registries, and cancer registries from Arkansas, Michigan, North Carolina, and Texas. We conducted counterfactual mediation analysis to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of sex on cancer risk, modeling birth defect status as mediator. State; birth year; plurality; and maternal race and ethnicity, age, and education were considered confounders. We conducted separate analyses limited to cancers diagnosed younger than 1 year of age. Results: Our dataset included 10 181 074 children: 15 110 diagnosed with cancer, 539 567 diagnosed with birth defects, and 2124 co-occurring cases. Birth defect status mediated 38% of the association between sex and cancer overall. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type, including acute myeloid leukemia (93%), neuroblastoma (35%), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (6%). Among children younger than 1 year of age at cancer diagnosis, the proportion mediated was substantially higher (82%). Conclusions: Our results suggest that birth defects mediate a statistically significant proportion of the relationship between sex and childhood cancer. The proportion mediated varied by cancer type and diagnosis age. These findings improve our understanding of the causal pathway underlying male sex as a risk factor for childhood cancer.

References Powered by Scopus

Sex differences in immune responses

3669Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006

1431Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide

1130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Characteristics associated with tumor development in individuals diagnosed with beckwith–wiedemann spectrum: Novel tumor-(epi)genotype-phenotype associations in the BWSp population

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incidence and survival for childhood central nervous system tumours in Australia, 1983–2016

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marcotte, E. L., Schraw, J. M., Desrosiers, T. A., Nembhard, W. N., Langlois, P. H., Canfield, M. A., … Lupo, P. J. (2020). Male sex and the risk of childhood cancer: The mediating effect of birth defects. JNCI Cancer Spectrum, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/JNCICS/PKAA052

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

54%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Researcher 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

46%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

31%

Engineering 2

15%

Chemistry 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0